.
Feedback

Nassau Notebook: Precinct Restructuring, Isles to Play in Brooklyn

A weekly look-in at the news of Nassau County.

Nassau Restructures Police Precincts

In an effort to cut back on spending, Nassau County Executive Ed Mangano and Police Commissioner Thomas Dale announced Monday that four of the county's eight police precincts will be restructured.

Four precincts will remain intact while the remaining four will be transformed into new Community Policing Centers, Mangano said.

Click here for more information on the .

Auxiliary Police Officers Needed

The Nassau County Auxiliary Police is looking for residents to volunteer and serve as members of the Auxiliary Police. The Auxiliary Police are volunteers dedicated to making their community a safe place to live. Members patrol in marked cars equipped with a two-way radio and emergency equipment.

Auxiliary Police Officers patrol seven days per week in our community in addition to assisting the Nassau Police (NCPD) with crowd control and traffic at community events. Another function of the Auxiliary Police is to assist the NCPD at any disaster scene or during any countywide emergency.

Applicants must be between 18-55, a Nassau County resident, a U.S. citizen and have a high school diploma or G.E.D. All applicants must also have a valid New York State drivers license. A 29-session training course held at the Nassau County Police Academy must be completed. For additional information, please call 573-8830 or email recruit@pdcnaux.org.

Islanders to Play Preseason Game in Brooklyn

The can't escape their dilapidated Long Island home until 2015, but the National Hockey League team will play a preseason game at the Barclays Center this October.

The Isles said on Tuesday that they will play the at the new building when they take on the New Jersey Devils on Oct. 2 at 7:30 p.m.

Hempstead Village Awarded $1.2 Million for Downtown Revitalization

Mangano announced Tuesday the allocation of a nearly $1.2 million Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) to the Village of Hempstead – the largest grant made to any incorporated Village in this year. The grant will fund a variety of projects in the Village, including improvements to streets and sidewalks in both the downtown business district and residential neighborhoods.

The CDBG will also help fund a variety of after school programs, including the Hempstead PAL recreational activities, PeeWee Football/Cheerleading Program, At-Risk Youth Basketball Program, and the EOC Soccer program. The allocation also includes funds for the Village’s Safe Routes to School program, a New York State Department of Transportation initiative that enables and encourages children to adapt to healthy and active lifestyles by promoting transportation alternatives and implementing projects that improve traffic safety.

Foster Care Audit Recoups More Than $50,000

Nassau County Comptroller George Maragos released a Department of Social Services Foster Care Payments audit which found 76 duplicate or overlapping payments totaling $78,334 and led to the recovery of $52,475. The audit reviewed payments from January 2008 through December 2009 during which 15,000 claims were processed.

In one case, a service provider reported a child as being present in two facilities for the same time period for the purposes of billing. As of the end of 2011, DSS had implemented many of the comptroller’s recommendations and reduced the number of errors even further.

Nassau County Auxiliary Police Executive Board Elected

Inspector Neal Rosenblatt, Commanding Officer of Nassau County Auxiliary Police Unit 116 -- which serves the Fifth Precinct with the exception of the Valley Stream and Elmont -- was reelected at the January 2012 executive board meeting held at the Nassau County Public Safety Center in Westbury. It is Rosenblatt's second term as chairman of the Nassau County Auxiliary Police Executive Board.

The executive board oversees the daily operations of the Auxiliary Police Program in Nassau County in conjunction with the NCPD. Other members serving on the board for 2012 are:

  • Vice Chairman; Lt. Kevin Meller of Syosset
  • Treasurer; Inspector Joanne Edling of Farmingdale
  • Secretary; Deputy Inspector Michael Bier of Hicksville
  • Lt. Raymond Montalvo of South Hempstead
  • Inspector Michael Spae of Mineola
  • Deputy Inspector Diane Laukaitus of Lynbrook
  • Lt. Thomas Field of Levittown

Malverne Mel Gives Nassau Residents Six More Weeks of Winter

Malverne Mel made his Groundhog Day forecast for Nassau County residents Thursday morning at 7 a.m. at Reese Park. Click here for Patch's .

Mac February 8, 2012 at 09:32 pm
Can you give us a list of these all star players the Islanders let go?
Mac February 8, 2012 at 09:41 pm
James 3 injuries over a span of 110 games started is bad? Remember also that the year he signed those next three years he started 188 games with a GAA under 3.00. His contract actually started the trend of all tghese long signings we see today.
Lloyd people care about all those things just not enough people. thsi isnt about th eIslanders but the building. Instead of that building generating money for NC it instead costs us money. Wait till the shows leave and people have to travel int the garden for everything but second rate concerts at the beach or in westbury. Wang isnt strong arming anyone just spelling out what will happen. No good businessman will ever buy the Islanders with the existing building, lease especially when the vending and parking is not making him any money. Lloyd you obviously hate Wang and see nothing wrong with the way the politicians handled this parcel. This should have been resolved a long time ago. watch your taxes go up when the coliseum shutters its doors.
ROBERT February 8, 2012 at 09:51 pm
Interesting how this all came to light after elections .
James M. February 8, 2012 at 10:33 pm
This is the Comptroller report. It actually says the County would be fine without the Islanders (page 9 of 16).
http://www.nassaucountyny.gov/agencies/Comptroller/NewsRelease/2011/documents/NVMC-Review_of_Proposed_Redevelopment_FINAL.pdf
James M. February 8, 2012 at 10:43 pm
Of course. Do you want a politician to torpedo his reelection campaign by being honest?
Mac February 8, 2012 at 10:55 pm
James the comptrollers report doesnt exactly say we will be fine without the islanders. this is what it say "...the County could retain revenue from the Coliseum in the absence of the Islanders." Could is an awfully big word in this sentence. I will point out to you that there is only one other arena this size in the US that does not have a primary tenant and it is less than 5 years old. It has a pro lax team, indoor soccer, concerts on a very regular basis of TOP liners, hosts NCAA games and is the primary site for a d1 hockey league. Now I will tell you it is having difficulty maintaining itself. They are in pursuit of an NHL franchise. You can look it up it is in KC. The NVMC would have a likely close without these things. If the primary temant leaves and isnt replaced it will be a tough to keep open. Also the lease is so poor that other tenants shy away. The powers in NC gave away much of the vending rights also. Forget the Islanders the politicians need to get together and figure this out because the revenue lost if the building closes will bemade up in our taxes.
Business Man February 9, 2012 at 02:22 pm
James,
Easy to say "entire league laughed when Isles signed DP". Who exactly laughed? Name someone specifically? All gossip. 2 Minor sprains and 1 concussion do not constitute an injury risk, sorry. It happened, but again, he drove a hard bargain and if he turned out even somewhat better than average & walked, you guys would be crucifying Wang for that. He put his money where his mouth was. Some contracts work out, others don't, that is sports. Steinbrenner had plenty of overspent\bad contracts too. Sather was ripped off by Gomez, Drury & Redden. He was very lucky to get 2 of them off his books. If he didn't Gaborik & Richards would not be Rangers today. Now, everyone praises the job Sather did. The DP contract is not holding the Isles back, they just have to move on without counting on him for anything.
Business Man February 9, 2012 at 02:23 pm
Mac is exactly correct. Without a main tenant and 4 other major indoor arenas in the area, the Coliseum would quickly deteriorate and close. To suggest otherwise, is contrary to any other arena situation in the country. In KC, that is the only arena within many miles. Here, there will be 4 other major arenas for any act to choose from.
James M. February 9, 2012 at 02:59 pm
Yeah just do a google search and you'll find the laughter from 2006 to today regarding this contract. Who cares what the Rangers or Yankees did? They are not asking Nassau County for a new arena. I never said it was holding the Islanders back just an example of the mismanagement of the Islanders under Wang. He even fired Neil Smith who constructed the 1994 Rangers after a month. Why because he wouldn't do this contract? If that is the case, Neil Smith is a genius.
James M. February 9, 2012 at 03:06 pm
Here's the exact quote
"It should also be noted that in 2004/05, when no Islanders games were played because of the NHL lockout, the County’s total SMG revenues did not decline significantly. This would seem to indicate that the County is able to book other events in the absence of the Islanders and thereby retain the revenue." I agree they have to keep it open, but instead of trying to build the next wonder of the world they should just build a new stadium and conference center like Indianapolis. One of the main reasons the Lighthouse project was killed was all the additional things Wang wanted to do. The Vote died because of Wang and not because of the Islanders.
Mac February 9, 2012 at 03:13 pm
James once again that four letter word is "seem". How are they going to make up the 760k per year from Islander tickets alone. The money they get from SMG is very deceptive because most come from Islander games. What vote are you referring too? the August vote? Kate Murray opposed the Lighthouse because she is a republican and the democrats lead by Suozzi supported it. The same Republican Kate Murray supported the vote we had in August for the new arena while the democrats were opposed. You dont think this had anythng to do with it?
Mac February 9, 2012 at 03:17 pm
James pleae look up your facts! If DP was signed to a 15 year contract on Sept 15 2006 and Neil Smith was hired on June 8 2006 then left within a month how did the DP signing impact it. From what I remember and looked up it was a dispute that trickled down management and how they were going to run the team. The decisions were being spread out to include to many people. It was at that time Pat Lafontaine also stepped down. Then please find me ANY owner or GM who always made the right choice and NEVER had a big signing go bad. It is the rick you take.
Business Man February 9, 2012 at 04:44 pm
Google search on several occasions states "after 2 succesful years, Dipietro was given a 15 yr. contract". Now, we can both disagree with that statement, but this was the perception of many at the time. All the negative statements about the contract seem to be from 2009 forward, not from 2006, when the contract was signed.
Now, those type of long term deals are more & more prevelant. By that point in time, the injuries had become a major issue. And the Ranger & Yankee comparision is this: -When they have many bad signings, it is still perceived as ok, because you still can be succesful despite these contracts -When Wang has 1 bad contract (really 2, with Yashin, in fairness), everyone jumps all over it. And, if the contract "is not holding the team back", as you state, then what is your point? He gave away 1 bad contract, we all agree to that. It has not prevented the team from success. We agree to that.
Business Man February 9, 2012 at 04:56 pm
If the Islanders were winning cups right now & filling the building every night and if they were owned by the most popular person in the world, I firmly believe Nassau taxpayers still would handily vote down a publically financed arena. That is why it needed to be done with private funds. The only way private funds would work is for a private investor to be able to make back their investment.That's how capitalism works.No one would be interested in building an arena on that land without other immenities to make back their investment. THAT is where Kate was at fault. Instead of meeting with Wang & trying to work out a scaled down Lighthouse, she refused, claiming "conflict of interest". Again, if she met with him and a reasonable solution could not be worked out, then we could decide who was holding up a solution. Since she would not negotiate, the main obsticle to a solution was the TOH. In fairness, the county was fine with the Lighthouse, under both the Suozzi and Mangano administrations.
James M. February 9, 2012 at 05:01 pm
Accountants try not to use absolutes for future considerations. I agree Murray's denial and support seems more tied to politics than changes to the plan. I am just aware from many of those that voted that it seemed like more of a referendum on Wang's management of the Islanders than about the Coliseum. I think if another company is put forth to manage and build on the property the same vote might have been a yes.
James M. February 9, 2012 at 05:08 pm
Neil Smith was fired and not a month later Snow is the GM and signing DP to a 15 yr contract. It's pretty obvious there is some connection between the two. Pat also got out of there when he saw what was happening. Wang himself pushed for this deal.
"You have to have a commitment to who you're working with," said Wang, who made billions as a software developer. "I've done this all my business career. Now I'm doing it in sports and everybody is like, 'Oh my God. How could he do that?'" He's right; pretty much everybody is like that. The Globe and Mail headline the next morning accused Wang of "Long Island Lunacy," while one unnamed NHL executive called the Islanders' owner "insane." Readers canvassed by CBC.ca almost universally said "what the…?" when asked their opinion on the deal. http://www.cbc.ca/sports/columns/newsmakers/charles-wang.html Again I feel the NO vote was based solely on Wang and not on the Coliseum or the Islanders.
James M. February 9, 2012 at 05:18 pm
Bad signing do not hold a team back. I agree. My point is and was that Nassau is not going to support Wang because
A. He threatened to pull the team if he doesn't get his way. This is NY we don't deal well with threats of any kind. We would gladly shoot ourselves in the foot so Wang loses. B. In a Recession, no one likes a Billionaire asking for a handout from the public. If the Islanders had asked for the handout again Nassau residents may have complied but Wang and Mangano asking for it after the Lighthouse Project was killed left a bad taste in everyone's mouth. C. There were no contracts settled before the vote. Everything was still "yeah Wang said they are going to do this and this. The details will be worked out after the vote". Do you buy a car without knowing how much it'll cost? Do you hand a contractor $40K and tell him to build an addition without a contract or defined details? NO. Don't blame anyone but Murray, Mangano and Wang for the fall of the Coliseum because all roads lead to their decisions.
Mac February 9, 2012 at 05:26 pm
I agree about the fans of the Islanders myself included even though I do attend 20+ games a year that if they won on a consistent basis the fans would come. But in this case it isnt about the fans really because even if the building sold out every night under the current lease Wang would barely break even if that. Then the top tier free agents do not want to come here. Regarding Neil Smith, jsut a bad overall move to begin with. I dont know the whole story do you? What was the agreement between neil and Wang? being called an "insane" owner isnt such a bad thing is it? I think they called Steinbrenner and Cuban the same. Bottom line though this is about the building and if things dont change the Islanders will be gone and I whole heartedly believe the place will also be gone.
Mac February 9, 2012 at 05:34 pm
James: Wang didnt threaten to leave if he didnt get his way. he made a statement saying this is no longer a viable arena for his club and his investment which he has every right to do. Thsi has nothign to do with getting his way but the reality of continuing to lose money EVERY year. B: WANG did NOT ask for a handout. this is a common misconception. Wang was prepared to pay for thsi privately and it was denied. This was the county they refuse to sell the property and want to control what goes their. If the county offered to sell the land and arena then Wang griped so be it. He tried to buy it they said NO. C; thos e contracts should have been completed for all to see. But once again this falls on the county. How did the COUNTY have the nerve to ask us to vote on something that wasnt complete. It shouldve been up to the county to see it to its completion before a vote. Instead we got a very underhanded shady election in August.
Wang did nothing wrong. he is trying to make more money. isnt this what a successful businessman does. The county shouldve worked with him to get this doen instead of asking us. remember the "handout" would not have lead to Wang owning the building or the property. he still would have been the tenant paying rent every month.
James M. February 9, 2012 at 06:03 pm
MAc My point which you keep glossing over is that it is about Wang. IF there is another group willing to develop the arena and everyone is willing to work with the new group you can claim politics (though Wang lost with a Democrat and Republican in charge) or you can easily say TOH and Nassau doesn't want to work with Wang in regards to the Coliseum.
I think Nassau residents are savvy enough to not trust Wang without a contract in place hence they voted no. Wang cannot move the Islanders without consent from the NHL and may be forced to sell. It has happened before and can and will happen again. Being called insane is always a bad thing but those that make a success are considered geniuses and those that don't (Wang) are considered well insane. So far Wang has not proven any of his critics wrong. THis is from NYTimes "The conflict with Smith involved the lack of a traditional general manager’s role, Wang told reporters yesterday at Nassau Coliseum in Uniondale, N.Y. He was referring to his unconventional view that his team’s front office would be run by committee. That was a philosophy that Smith ultimately could not work under." Bottom Line the Lighthouse Project and the referendum vote were about Wang. Maybe with a new development group it will be about the building. THe Islanders will probably stay at the Coliseum whether it is under Wang or a new owner remains to be seen.
Mac February 9, 2012 at 06:22 pm
James I am not glossing over anything this is NOT about Wang. What has he ever done to the people of nassau county. Yes Wang lost woth a republican and a democrat and dont you see then when aligned with rep dems blocked then when aligned with dens the republicans blocked it. This isnt a concern that are elected officlals backed Wang when there party was in power and against when it wasnt? I dont think we should trust ANYONE without a contract in place. But that falls on the county for presenting something for us to vote on that was incomplete, done in a rush and during a stand alone August vote during a reccesion. You are right the NHL needs to approve the move and bettman already stated he wants a team here but the Coliseum may no longer be able to sustain an NHL franchise. I heard him speak those words on WFAN. A new owner would never buy this team under this current lease in this old dilapitated outdated building. If the people of the county were dumb enough to vote NO because of Wang I live in a county of idiots. They voted no because it was a poorly timed, hastily put together plan done in August to try and be sneaky. the people of Nassau were not fooled by these tactics. AND if Wang persuaded Mangano and crew to go forward under these terms they are idiots and once again playing political games. Your quote from the times is what I said??? But dont you think Smith knew thisgoing in before accepting the job? Wang is losing boatlaods of money here and that is a fact.
James M. February 9, 2012 at 07:42 pm
No I don't think Smith knew what he was getting into and neither did Pat LaFontaine hence why they were fired and/or quit in such a short period of time. I've never actually seen the books of the Islanders and I know the NHL plays accounting games with TV rights and the concessions so I could not say for sure he is losing money and no one could. Wang has never opened his books to the public so all we have to go by are politicians and PR reports which are as useless as the paper they are printed on. If the Islanders were in the playoffs every year, Wang would be making money but the team that is on the ice is incapable of winning more than 50% of their games and a lot of that is due to Wang's Management and a history of bad management of the Islanders. I won't go into the numerous instances of bad management of the team. There are websites dedicated to just that. Mac you are too quick to blame everyone else from the voters to the politicians when the factor common to all of these problems is Wang himself. I agree no buyer is going to buy the team as they are right now in the building they are right now. However I think the new development group which includes Blumenfeld has a much better chance of building something than Wang ever did. Wang should be concerned with putting a competitive product on the ice. He's had 10 years and failed at every step of developing a winning team.
James M. February 9, 2012 at 08:03 pm
http://www.fieldofschemes.com/news/archives/2011/06/4596_nassau_projecti.html
So the county would be paying to build an arena and handing over control of 77 acres of development rights to Islanders owner Charles Wang, and in return would get ... somewhere between a $12 million a year loss and a $2 million (and rising) a year profit, assuming you count as "profit" taxes that any development on the site, including the existing Nassau Coliseum, would be paying anyway.
Mac February 9, 2012 at 09:46 pm
James of course Wang is the common thread he is the owner of the team. Also I agree one hundred percent for the county to build and give control would be moronic at best! I just do not think Wang deserves the blame. I firmly believe the politicians could've gotten it done.
Business Man February 9, 2012 at 10:12 pm
There is no way Nassau voters would build a new arena with Public money, no matter who owns the team or how well they are doing. Did you see how lopsided the vote was? Not even close. Exit polls-resounding consensous was-not a penny more for my taxes. Face it, Nassau voters are not "savy" at all, most hardly knew any of the issues involved, all they were worried about was their taxes. The vast majority of times in the US, voters will always vote down almost ANYTHING that will raise their taxes. That is election fact. That is why the only way to build a new arena was with private money. It will never pass any public vote, no matter what.
Business Man February 9, 2012 at 10:22 pm
A stubborn, unwillingness to sit down and negotiate. That was the problem. Wang was willing to sit down and negotiate. That is fact. Whether or not he would have budged enough on the Lighthose to satisfy most? We will never know. The county approved the original Lighthouse. Fact. The private development was shot down by the TOH. Fact. Our Town Supervisior refused to sit down with the Wang\Rechler group & negotiate, claiming "conflict of interest" Fact.
My opinion, Wang was too easy not to call the town to task on this. This should have been front & center in the last election that Ms. Murray won by another Landslide. If people realized that the town board was why the process was stopped, perhaps the election might have been much closer. Force her to the negotiating table.
Lloyd February 9, 2012 at 10:31 pm
James M.....I agree 100% with your posts.
It IS all about Wang and his credibility and reputation. The public is not stupid or so forgiving. The timing.of the Aug. Referendum was a sham and didnt fool the public either. Wang has lost touch with the public and lost his ability to make deals with the politicians. He plans and schemes for Mitcel Field were way too overbearing and expensive for the public to accept And he must be a bastard to deal with. We can let Neil Smith testify to that. Worst case scenario...Wang moves the Isles to Brooklyn and we lose an NHL team. Best case...He sells the team to a legitimate deep pocketed and experienced sports group and they make a deal with the County to share the costs for a new building. The other scenario is that Wang moves the Isles to KC and we lure back in here one of the many struggling NHL franchises to wait for the new arena to be built or have one ready for them. Like you say, James...if Wang stays we get nothing done.
Mac February 9, 2012 at 10:54 pm
Once agin Lloyd your ignorance shows. The politicians played Wang for their benefit to oppose each other. Suozzi said yes Murray said no then manganous said yes to a much worse deal for the taxpayer and the dema said no. Your common thread is dem vs rep. Wang didn't come up with the entire August fiasco. Some geniuses we voted for thought it was a great idea to scam us. When was the last election Wang called? What is so hard to understand that the county does not want to share that property. They have clearly stated many times they will not sell it or give up any right.. Any owner would be crazy to deal with these guys as the deficit continues to grow. Who are we luring back to the coliseum ? If we built a new arena the isles would stay. A team would never come back here especially after we have shown just how little the isles mean to us.
Lloyd February 10, 2012 at 03:44 am
Mac, you are wrong. I can name at least 4 NHL cities that teams deserted and then new ones were lured back.
Ok. Let' s go. Atlanta Winnepeg Minnesota Colorado And I may have missed some. Teams come and go in the NHL like the coaches on the Devils and Islanders draft picks. Long Island is a very lucrative market for a wealthy and hockey savvy owner. Somebody else will swoop on in the minute the Islanders are out the door. And if you think I am ignorant, then you are pig headed. You refuse to put the blame squarely on whom it belongs. Your loyalty is nauseating. And to be fair...I dont blame Wang for the summertime referendum. That nonsense was Manganos idea. But Wang stood up there defiant after his devastating defeat like he was in cahoots with Mangano and took it personally. In the meantime, I see plenty of commercials for upcoming shows and events at the "dangerous, outdated, and dilapidated" Nassau Coliseum. For every jerk--- promoter who backs out of booking the Coliseum, there doesnt appear to be a shortage of promoters who see dollar signs at that ancient arena....Except for Mac and his closetful of Islanders fans. I tuned into the Islanders-Canadiens game tonight. Not only did they get blown away, no one was at the game to even witness it and help Wang meet rent and payroll. Its sad. Very sad. BTW...I also watched the Rangers comeback victory in front of a full house at 45 year old MSG. How do you explain that phenomenon?
Mac February 10, 2012 at 11:27 am
Ok mr ignorant also known as LLoyd please I beg you loook up your facts. Since 1917 whcih is 95 years there have been 3 teams that have relocated back to a location that once had hockey Ottowa, Colorado and Atlanta then two cities were awarded expansion teams that once had hockey Minny and ATL. You can correct me if I am wrong. So at most 5 teams in 95 years is not a common at all. LI is such a lucrative market that in your own words the coliseum was less than full and the county wouldnt support a new arena. A savy owner wouldnt get involved with this mess until an arena would be built. Wang did nothing wrong in trying to get a new arena and own the land. The politicians should have made a bi-partisan attempt to get this done. But you live in NC that just doesnt happen. Yes there are shows at the coliseum and there will be as long as it is open. Take a look at the percentage of open dates vs teh Rock or in Philly. Really cant compare MSG because they have two pro teams. Then last night I was at the game and yes it wsnt full but it was a good sized crowd. MTL always brings fans. Then I guess a 4-2 game with an empty net goal by MTL was a blowout where the shots on goal where in the Isles favor. It was actually a very good game the Rangers are consistent sell outs in Manhattan the most famous arena in sports. Ranger fans support their team as does the city. People who live in the county do not.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Rockville Centre Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Stephen J. Bronner (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 05:01 pm
There will be a fire department parade that day. Will have more details soon.
Demott Ave June 18, 2013 at 10:21 am
http://www.nysdrillteams.com/lineups/0622-parade-4batt.htm
insider June 19, 2013 at 10:48 am
The parade is a wonderful community event, which brings the community together to support ourRead More volunteer firepeople, however, did anyone take into account that this weekend is the graduation of our high school and many people in our community will be hosting parties in their homes. This is going to put a burden on our homeowners in that area.
Alison Gilbert June 18, 2013 at 07:32 am
I have two comments: If you want to contact the Village, contact Mayor Francis X. Murray. I don'tRead More know what block you live on. But on my block, the leaf blowers are DAILY and at ANY time of day. It is horrible noise pollution.
Truth teller June 19, 2013 at 01:16 pm
gardeners can't come in the rain ,so in weeks that have a torrential downpour ,tell your gardener toRead More put your work off till next week instead of finishing up on Saturdays or do your own gardening by hand so everything will be really quiet.
tommy calabrese June 17, 2013 at 08:42 am
What about the prostitutes that stay at the area hotels. we stayed at best western on sunriseRead More highway after sandy and we were approached at least 3x's. besides getting bed bug bites. The manager said its a problem in all the hotels
John June 16, 2013 at 07:12 pm
Why don't you ask the police chief, or village board...Public knowledge if interested