patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Board Recap: Oppenheimer Questions Cancellieri Hiring, South Nassau Deal

Trustee wonders if village received a fair deal with hospital for parking spots in Municipal Lot No. 12.

 

Fireworks sparked among trustees at the Village Board meeting on Monday after Trustee Ed Oppenheimer openly questioned the hiring of Tony Cancellieri and the parking deal he helped negotiate with South Nassau Communities Hospital.

Cancellieri was hired a month ago — at a rate of $20,000 a month — as a consultant to the village and will perform the duties of village administrator for the next two months until a replacement is found for former administrator Frank Quigley.

Cancellieri helped negotiate a deal to lease 150 parking spots in Field No. 12 to South Nassau Communities Hospital, netting the village at least $50,000 and potentially more over the next five years. Oppenheimer said when he found out that Cancellieri was a board member at South Nassau, "it made me wonder just who Mr. Cancellieri was negotiating with."

Mayor Fran Murray said Cancellieri's connection to South Nassau was fully disclosed to the board, and when Oppenheimer tried to butt in during Murray's explanation, tempers began to boil. "Excuse me, I'm not finished!" Murray yelled. "Do not interrupt me!"

Oppenheimer added that South Nassau paid Park Strategies — a firm that helps navigate public policy and business development for its clients — to lobby on its behalf. Oppenheimer said Cancellieri is currently employed by Park Strategies. "In my mind, this raises questions as to where Mr. Cancellieri's allegiance lies in this matter."

Acting Village administrator Mike Schussheim questioned Oppenheimer on why he was so adamant that the village did not receive a fair deal for the spots in Lot No. 12. "I could understand if the rates were out of line," he said.

Schussheim noted that the village received a better rate per spot than it had when it initially negotiated leasing parking spots to South Nassau two years ago, and the current rate is higher than the Molloy parking deal. "If the complaint is that we should get more...no one is willing to pay a significantly higher rate," he said. "I don't understand the issue."

Deputy Mayor Nancy Howard agreed with Schussheim, saying it's additional revenue for the village by leasing spots that are barely used. "It's land that sits, unused for most of the time," Howard said.

Oppenheimer agreed that it's underused, but said that South Nassau was in dire need for parking and the village should have taken advantage of it. Trustee Kevin Glynn said the village needed an alternative source of revenue and this was a perfect opportunity to gain it.

"We as village trustees owe a duty to the tax payers to do everything we can to find viable sources of revenue other than through higher taxes," he said in an email to Patch. "The demand by Trustee Oppenheimer that the village allow the parking lot and our coffers to remain empty due to unrealistic expectations and an unwillingness to compromise exhibits an unfortunate dereliction of that duty. I am proud of my vote in support of the lease agreement and wish that we had entered into it much sooner."

Alex Cepero

1:44 pm on Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Citing this article and past incidents, its obvious that Mayor Murray is a hot head.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teddy B

1:06 pm on Thursday, November 24, 2011

I could not disagree more Alex. What would you do if an arrogant loudmouth was constantly interrupting you? Seems to me that Mayor Murray was just fending off Oppenheimer's attempt to dominate the proceedings yet again.

And what other incidents can you cite to back up your claim that Mayor Murray is a "hot head?"

Ray

3:28 pm on Tuesday, November 22, 2011

And what I get from this article and past incidents it's obvious that Oppenheimer continues to be his arrogant self - butting in while someone else is speaking, refusing to apologize after illegally stopping and searching children, and constantly picking fights.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin O'Reilly

9:32 pm on Thursday, November 24, 2011

Mr Oppenheimer can tend to be a little heavy handed, at times. However, in this case he was right to question the ethics of the "negotiations". He also appears to be the only Trustee not afraid to ask the difficult questions.

Comment_arrow

Ray

9:45 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

Mr. O'Reilly, I have no problem with Oppenheimer, or anyone else for that matter, asking questions. I do have a problem with interrupting while people are answering the questions he asked. I have a problem with his arrogance and I really have a problem with what happened on Halloween. As for the only Trustee not afraid to ask the difficult questions, it seems to me that Mr. Cancellieri's connections to South Nassau was fully disclosed and the Village got a fair rate for the spots that were leased - in fact it's a better deal than the one the past administration negotiated which then fell through so I don't know what the problem is.

Comment_arrow

Teddy B

8:57 pm on Friday, November 25, 2011

Oh please Kevin, Oppenheimer wastes everyone's time asking questions that he already knows the answers to. He seems to have some sick need to draw attention to himself. I do not get the impression that he is the only one willing to ask "tough questions." I get the impression that he is the only board member who puts his own interests and ego before the needs of the village. I can't wait to vote against him in 2013!

bill eidler

7:31 pm on Tuesday, November 22, 2011

If the village is looking for alternative means of revenue, why did it eliminate the meters after 6pm? That is definitely LOST revenue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave Kloven

10:08 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

because the village is trying to help out the business owners.. too many vacant stores.. vacant stores mean lost tax revenue

Comment_arrow

RVC Know Nothing

7:31 pm on Friday, November 25, 2011

Dave the village is certainly trying to help out store owners...they recently cut the restaurant license fee from 2500 to 1700 there by loosing $40,000 in tax revenue from the 50 biggest restaurants in town.

And for the record vacant stores have nothing to do with tax revenue! Although it is good to have a healthy business district it has nothing to do with tax revenue.

Bill you make an excellent point about the parking meters. I was wondering that myself. Actually I think about every time I try and park after 6pm and can't find a space!

Bugs Bunny

8:35 pm on Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Well at least that $50,000 is 83% of the money that Mr. Cancellieri is getting paid. Maybe the new administration figured out that there isn't enough money to pay a consultant. So now leasing parking spots was the only option they had to get some revenue.

Reply

Dave Kloven

8:23 am on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

If this is the parking lot opposite Morrisey GMC on Sunrise hwy, its a miracle the village could sell these spots... This parking lot is always emptry, which would lead me to believe, anyone could park there now if they have a resident parking sticker. ...... Why is Oppenheimer disputing this? Does he just like to read about himself in the Herald? Has he apologized for sheading the Constitution and going out "Vigilanty" style terrorizing kids on Halloween yet?

Reply

Clarkey Mick

10:35 am on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

I agree Dave K. Oppenheimer is out to get his name mentioned any way that he can. He sees any publicity as good publicity. He confided in my neighbor that he will run against Murray himself in 4 years. When asked if he thinks he'll win his trustee seat again, he stated he was a guaranteed win.

Reply

Interested Bystander

12:37 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

The interesting thing is that Oppenheimer never, ever proposes a single solution. Frankly, I'm surprised he didn't propose another parking committee or one of his famous parking "studies" No. 5,237. Yea that's it - let's sepnd $300,000 on Ed's consultants to figure out if we should rent out an abandoned parking lot for $45,000. And his comparison of the St. Agnes lot and what those spots fetch $ wise v. the lot on Sunrise opposite the car dealerships is beyond belief. "Guaranteed win" when he runs again - thanks for the laugh of the year! It's not even going to be close.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RVC Know Nothing

7:43 pm on Friday, November 25, 2011

FYI Ed served for years on the parking committee and to my knowledge consultants were never hired. Also, the parking lot is not "abandoned." It is used by residents of the Jefferson apartments and Maple Point. It is also used when the police need to do inspections of trucks traveling on Sunrise. And it is used by businesses across the street like Wild Ginger.

Comment_arrow

Teddy B

8:59 pm on Friday, November 25, 2011

That lot may not be totally abandoned but it looks awfully empty every time I drive past it.

Comment_arrow

Interested Bystander

11:19 pm on Saturday, November 26, 2011

Yes Ed has "served for YEARS on the parking committee" - and what exactly has it accomplished? Anything at all? The lot that was leased was essentially abandoned. Teddy B is right - it's empty. The restaurant and the apartment residents likely use the lot, if at al, at night. South Nassau's highest need is during the day. The police can still do their inspections or use an alternate space with the help of the Village. Seems like a win win for all - except for the loudmouth that likes to gum up the works and hear himself speak for the sake of hearing his own voice.

EJ's son

8:06 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Surprise, surprise - I actually agree with the Mayor on this one. Any money is good money for this empty space. I do doubt Canellieri's influence on the whole process though. South Nassau was already hot for the deal. Any reasonable number would have been accepted and it was. The Mayor or Village Administrator should have done the deal themselves.

Reply

Ellen

8:33 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011

If you read about the parking situation at South Nassau, you would see that the hospital has a desperate need for parking spots. They have resorted to buying homes so they can use the lots for parking. The relationship with the residents is toxic. RVC held all the cards in that deal and didn't maximize them. We could have gotten more money.
I also don't understand how eliminating parking fees after 6 PM is supposed to help merchants since most shops close at 6PM. Why didn't they just extend the amount of hours you feed the meter? We could have charged for parking until midnight and then again in the morning before shops open. Residents weren't complaining about paying for parking but what they considered to be overly agressive ticketing. That would give people plenty of time to see a movie, have dinner or go drinking.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teddy B

6:27 pm on Friday, December 2, 2011

Is South Nassau's desperation a recent developement? The prior administration failed to get a deal done. Was South Nassau not desperate then? Why didn't they just throw buckets of money at Village Hall a year ago if they were so desperate?

Comment_arrow

Mickey

4:05 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Good question Teddy. If South Nassau was so desperate then why didn't they blow the previous board or the current board out of the water with a big offer?

bill eidler

1:15 pm on Friday, December 2, 2011

All you have to do is ask the Mayor or the comptroller if Frank Quigley is still being paid. If the answer is YES, then he is on the payroll. Another vacant store now that Harmon drug is closing this month.

Reply

Teddy B

6:22 pm on Friday, December 2, 2011

Exactly Bill!! Don't listen to message board posters like myself and John, call Village Hall as I did and you will see whether myself or John is correct.....I already know the answer but just for fun I encourage all readers to call Village Hall if you want the truth.

Reply

Ellen

4:55 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Teddy B, apparently as the hospital expands so do their employee's parking needs. From what I have read the purchase of homes has become very controversial as neighbors not only feel it will diminish the value of their homes. There is also a question of what tax will be paid to Oceanside if these lots are no longer homes. Many are concerned if that practice continues there could be a decrease in revenue to the town. Also, another article said that the hospital has made two ad hoc payments to homeowners to compensate them for decreased home value - not confirmed by the hospital. Clearly, the hospital can't continue down that path. This is basic sales - supply and demand - we have what they need. Since you asked.. why would a buyer throw buckets of money at a supplier who isn't asking for the buckets? I just think it's too bad that RVC didn't get a better deal. Those deals should not be done by politicians but by professionals who know how to negotiate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teddy B

5:07 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Yes it is basic sales....you extract what the market will yield. You claim the village should have received more money for the spots but you fail to back up your assertion with ANY relevant facts. Anecdotal evidence about the beef between Oceanside and South Nassau is interesting but largely irrelevant to the discussion about parking lots. I would be more interested to hear how much money other towns get for renting out their municipal lots.

Ellen

7:59 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

My information is based on articles in Oceanside papers and not irrelevant. You clearly think it's a fair price without relevant facts either that state it is a fair price. Perhaps, as village residents those who negotiated the deal should share that information with us. You also clearly can't stand Mr Oppenheimer which is perhaps clouding your judgement?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teddy B

3:53 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

I don't care where your info came from,the origin of your info is irrelevant to my point. My point is that if you want to claim that the village could have received soooooo much more money for the parking then I think you will need to come up with more solid evidence to prove your case. Maybe you are correct,but you did not prove your case. Oh, and don't worry about my judgement honey,I am concerned with the issues that impact our village and that keeps me quite clear and focused....Oppenheimer's childish behaivor is a side show.

Interested Bystander

12:22 am on Monday, December 5, 2011

Respectfully - if everyone who couldn't stand Mr. Oppenheimer had their judgment "clouded" and therefore had to remain mute, pretty much the entire Village would be silenced. Except the mouth that roared of course.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin O'Reilly

10:50 am on Monday, December 5, 2011

Mr Byestander, so are you saying that your judgement is therefor clouded? I voted for Mr Oppenheimers opponents. I believe that the Halloween incident was reprehensible, on it's face. However, I am not blinded (or clouded) from judging other issues separately. Have a nice day!

Ellen

8:54 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Teddy B, I have tried to keep my comments to a non-personal level but your referring to me as honey requires a response. You seem to need name calling to make your points. Since you like facts to back things up here is a sample of the adjectives you use - arrogant, loudmouth, sick, childish and honey. Perhaps, you should turn that clear focus of yours on your communication skills. People would be able to get past your name calling and understand exactly what your point is. That is, if you have one other than to personally disparage someone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teddy B

5:03 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Perhaps I'm old school but to me calling someone "honey" is not "name calling." I refer to people as honey,kiddo,etc all the time and it is not meant as an insult. Perhaps the reason you mistook my post as an insult was because I was answering a post in which you had insulted me and questioned my judgement? I was not responding in kind and I'm sorry you were offended....I meant no harm. As for my descriptions of Trustee Oppenheimer's antics....I stand by my analysis which is based on watching board meetings. You call it "name calling" and I call it an accurate description of his conduct.

Kevin O'Reilly

9:58 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

No need to blow the Board out with a big offer, when the guy negotiating for them is on your Board.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teddy B

5:08 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Was Cancillieri on the previous board as well?

Ray

7:57 am on Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Let's see - the Village was able to rent out underused spaces for more money than they were offered two years ago under the previous administration which for one reason or another fell through. (By the way, does anyone know why that deal fell through?) This deal will add at least $50,000 of revenue to the village that we didn't have - and all connections were disclosed. It looks like a win-win situation for both the village and the hospital. I don't know why we would need to blow anyone out of the water - a fair deal was struck and both parties are happy with it. I understand Ellen's complaints, but by the hospital leasing these spaces, doesn't that help alleviate the burden on the neighborhood surrounding the hospital? I know it doesn't answer the problem totally, but it is a first step.

Reply

common sense

10:44 am on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Question: Has anyone considered the effect vehicles exiting the lot onto Long Beach Road will have on LB Road traffic at the end of the business day?
As of now it is almost impossible to enter LB road at any street that does not have a traffic signal between 4pm and 6pm due to the increase in traffic congestion at those times. Having SN employees entering LB road southbound from that exit will only make traffic on LB north of Sunrise that much worse. Was this even a thought in the heads of the consultants or trustees? Anyone who has an answer is free to respond.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mickey

4:53 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

That is a good question CS. I have two questions to add to this line of thought: 1) can cars exit on the other side of the lot as well as the Long Beach Rd exit? 2) do we know the shift schedules of SN employees? Will all the additional traffic be between 4-6 PM?

I can't speak to what did or not go through the minds of the consultants or the trustees. Perhaps this question should be raised at the next board meeting.

EJ's son

2:31 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

You can exit on Sunrise - but you can't turn left or you can exit at the far end on N. Forest.

Reply

Clarkey Mick

12:08 pm on Friday, January 6, 2012

Let me get this straight. Cancellieri was so necessary that we have to pay him $20,000 a month for 3 months to negotiate with labor (which has not even begun I understand), find Frank Quigley's replacement (who is still working in Village Hall), and he just took a loved one to Paris for 3 weeks? A 3 week vacation in a 3 month job that pays $20,000 a month? I think it's time to bail on RVC. Suffolk is the new Nassau & Nassau is the new Queens. RVC will be Freeport in 5 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mickey

4:42 pm on Friday, January 6, 2012

See ya' Frank....enjoy Suffolk buddy:)

Clarkey Mick

12:09 pm on Friday, January 6, 2012

All this from October 15, 2011 to January 15th, 2012? The next 9 days will be a whirlwind. If Tony's back from France yet.

Reply

Clarkey Mick

12:17 pm on Friday, January 6, 2012

This had better be a joke. A bad one.
What is the state of contract negotiations with managers, CSEA, & PBA?
What is happening with the repairing of the streets?
What is being done about quality of life crimes in busines district?
What is being done about the projects concerning shootings?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mickey

4:46 pm on Friday, January 6, 2012

Hi Frank....er....John Ellebmar. At least you stopped telling lies about Mr.Quigley still being on the payroll under your new name. HAHAHA!!!

Clarkey Mick

10:54 am on Saturday, January 7, 2012

Frank Quigley still works for and is paid by Village Hall.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mickey

10:16 am on Sunday, January 8, 2012

Hi Frank....er...John Ellebmar or whatever you are calling yourself these days. Frank Quigley retired and is not receiving his salary. It is true that Mr.Quigley still does some work at Village Hall but he is no longer receiving his salary. That is a fact! Just as before when this guy attempted to spread these lies I encourage everyone who reads the patch to find out for yourself. Whether he calls himself Frank Wilson or John Ellebmar this guy is a liar.

Leave a comment